Forsys - Produktionsbeginn

wir wissen das rsr zum teil blindgänger sind ! warum!? fragst du mich !?

weil rsr forsys nicht im depot hat! und das ist auch gut so !  ;-)  

Heut ist Forsystag, auf gehts kämpfen und siegen (würden die Bayerns im Stadion singen) aber mehr als ein 1:1 war auch nicht drinnen!

FSY wird langfristig über ein 1:1 hinauskommen, davon bin ich überzeugt. Freu mich schon auf den Sommer, und auf Jahresende, und dann auf 2009 und 2010 wenn WIR in Produktion gehen, dann kann rsr recht haben mit 15 Euro, soll so sein, weil dann...... :-))))

Mal steigt sie, mal fällt sie, langfristig zählt, aber naja man muss ja mal ein kleinwenig jammern, weil RAMBO tut das ja auch :-.)))  

bei dem ganzen optimismus hier, kann es nur in die hose gehen........

sind die Aktien, über die gar nicht diskutiert wird. Einfach weil sie keine Sorgen bereiten. Die steigen einfach weil sie schon groß und stark sind. Da sieht der Big-Chart richtig gut aus.

Forsys kackt noch in die Windeln.

http://www.canadianinsider.com/coReport/allTransactions.php?ticker=fsy  

und wie liest man die? Was sagen die uns? So eine Art von Listen habe ich noch nie gesehen.  

Infos aus dem anderen Forum:

Demnach hat die südkoreanische Regierung eine Baugenehmigung für die Reaktoren Shin-Kori 3 and 4 erteilt. KHNP betreibt bereits 20 Reaktoren mit 17.500 MW installierter Leistung. 3 Reaktoren befinden sich im Bau (wird in der Meldung ebenfalls angesprochen) und 5 sind in Planung. Die neuen Reaktoren sollen ab 2010 in Betrieb gehen. Die installierte Gesamtleistung soll sich bis 2016 um mehr als 50% erhöhen. Eine Abschaltung von älteren Reaktoren ist bis auf weiteres nicht geplant (frühestens ab 2017). In diesem Jahr benötigt KHNP ca. 3.100 t Uran. Wenn der Uranbedarf linear mit der installierten Leistung steigt, wird sich die pro Jahr benötigte Menge bis 2016 auf ca. 4.500 t Uran erhöhen.

Angesichts dieses Wachstums erscheint es nur logisch, dass KEPCO direkten Zugang zu Uranminen anstrebt, zumal Südkorea über keine eigenen Uranvorkommen verfügt. Forsys wird hoffentlich davon profitieren.

http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/...r_Shin-Kori_3_and_4-2504085.html

Und noch eine weitere interessante Meldung: In Finnland befindet sich ja am Standort Olkiluoto der erste European Pressurized Reactor (EPR) im Bau (mittlerweile wurde in Frankreich mit einem zweiten begonnen). Das Projekt hatte bereits mit einigen Problemen/Verzögerungen zu kämpfen. Wer nun aber glaubte, dass dies die Finnen vom Bau weiterer neuer Reaktoren abhalten könnte, hat sich getäuscht. Am selben Standort soll ein weiterer Reaktor gebaut werden:

http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/..._in_for_Olkiluoto_4_2404081.html  

Zwei interessante Artikel über die Zukunft von Kernenergie.

http://www.wiwo.de/unternehmer-maerkte/...or-kernenergie-boom-271773/

Auch in Deutschland fordern jetzt sogar die "Grünen" einen Erhalt der Kernenergie.

http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/0,1518,544120,00.html

Grüße @ all

chinalover  

...der den Brennstoff Liefert, das ist doch OK....  

Ich habe meinen Shares von FSY einfach Sparbuchfunktion erteilt, immer wenn mir einiges übrig bleibt, dann kauf ich nach und bau das Investment aus, weil der Boom wird kommen, und ich bin dabei! FSY sitzt auf verwertbarem und interessantem Uran, und das ist nicht nur für Kepco von Interesse, sondern auch für fangen wir ganz vorne an für Investmentfonds :-))) und der Kaufdrang nach Rostoffen und Energien steigt und steigt, weil der Ölpreis und der Dollar sind ja lächerlich, was die Amies da schon wieder aufführen gehört normalerweise verboten, aber lang dauerts nicht mehr, dann spielen die nicht mehr mit, bald kommen die Asiaten und die Russen und die Afrikaner mit der fetten Knette und der Reserven und dann kann der Ausbeuter Nummer eins einpacken, deren Zeit ist meiner Meinung nach bereits vorbei, die Phase die dort kommen werden: Rez, Stag, Infla, Konsos, udgl. und dann werden sich die aufbäumen die wirklich mitzureden haben!

Uran wird als Energielieferant der Zukunft gehandelt, auf dem man sich wirklich langfristig verlassen kann, nicht Wind oder Sonne oder Braunkohle, weil die sind nicht immer da, und wenn sie da sind, dann zu wenig, und Braunkohle, naja von dem müssen wir nicht reden, was umweltschädlicheres gibts ja gar nicht !

FSY wird meiner Meinung nach einer der Bigplayer, wenn sie alle anderen Projekte auch noch umsetzen und bei Uran die eine oder andere Mine auch noch in Produktion bringen dann gibts den Konkurrenz für Cameco und die anderen!!!

In diesem Sinne durchhalten, nachkaufen und zusehen wies steigt!
Meine Meinung!

 

China’s Battle for African UraniumPosted by diezelsblog6263 in Uncategorized

As reported by the Wall Street Journal, Sunday night’s revelations that China National Nuclear Corp (CNNC) may strengthen its ties to UraMin could represent a broader picture than an ordinary acquisition of a near-term uranium producer.

There is an ongoing global war for energy security, which appears to be politically inspired. China and Russia are the main opponents, especially in Africa, but have rivaled each other, over the past several years, in Central Asia. The goal for both nations is not only energy security but political influence and alliance over their targeted territories.

On May 12th, Russia, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan signed a declaration to upgrade and expand transport pipelines along the Caspian Sea coast directly to Russia. The project relies mainly upon the vast Turkmen gas reserves. This is part of Russia’s growing monopoly of Central Asian gas. Although Europe was shocked by Vladimir Putin’s new arrangement, the Chinese were flabbergasted.

We’ve been following developments in Central Asia, and had reported upon milestone events in both of our uranium publications, and again (with far greater details) in our soon-to-be-released Investing in China’s Energy Crisis.

After more than two decades in power, Turkmen strongman Saparmurat Niyazov passed away this past December. In April 2006, Niyazov had signed a framework agreement on oil and gas cooperation. By August, Niyazov had announced a pipeline, designed to pump gas to China, would be opened in 2009. The deal died with the dictator, it appears.

A few weeks ago, a spokesman for China’s National Reform and Development Committee announced China was unlikely to reach its natural gas target of a 10-percent portion of the country’s energy portfolio by 2010. Increasingly, Russia has shut China out of Central Asia in obtaining long-term, multiple energy sources.

Aside from South America, where China has strengthened the country’s ties with Venezuela and others, Africa is a prime hunting ground for China’s future energy security. China has established a strong foothold in the Sudan for petroleum. But, Africa is rich in uranium deposits.

According to a report published by the International Atomic Energy Agency in 2005, Africa has 18 percent of the world’s known recoverable uranium resources - about six percent less than Australia and one percent more than Kazakhstan. We began coverage on both Namibia and Niger, after Russia sent a delegation to Egypt to discuss the nuclear renaissance. At the time, our research pointed to Africa, particularly those countries, as ripe for future uranium production. Chinese prospectors raced to Niger within weeks after our initial coverage.

During 2006, Namibia became saturated with numerous exploration plays hoping to capitalize on the country’s uranium resources and relaxed environment. Consequently, the Namibian Minister of Mines and Energy closed the country’s exploration window. Since then, Niger has become a new hunting ground. We expect this country to become just as saturated as Namibia has been.

China is eager to capitalize upon the continent’s uranium resources before Russia outmaneuvers them as has been accomplished in Central Asia.

According to an email we received from TradeTech’s Gene Clark, after presenting at the China Power & Alternative Energy Summit on May 18th, he told us China’s official target for nuclear power capacity was ‘40 GWe by 2020 and another 18 GWe in the following five-year plan.’ This confirms China’s aggressive plans to acquire sufficient uranium to reach this capacity, and would be foolish to rely on just Australia.

Typically, China has built its energy portfolio through numerous deals across multiple regions. This past October, Yang Changli, vice president of China National Nuclear, said it would seek uranium not only from Australia, but from Canada, Kazakhstan, South Africa and Namibia. In an interview Yang gave during the 15th Pacific Basin Nuclear Conference, he said, “China won’t rely on any single supplier of uranium because of energy security considerations.

Namibia is the First African Focus of Uranium Politiques

On May 14th, Russia’s second-largest bank Vneshtorgbank and Russia’s state-run nuclear exporter Tekhsnabexport announced they were considered a joint venture to operate in Namibia through licenses they directly hold and through investments in other companies which have obtained licenses in Namibia.

In March Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Fradkov announced his country was prepared to building nuclear plants in Namibia. Neighboring South Africa had previously warned Namibia to expect reductions in energy supplies. Namibia is dependent upon South Africa for electricity and has forecast an energy deficit of 300 megawatts within the next three years.

On May 10th, Russia and Kazakhstan signed an agreement to set up the International Uranium Enrichment Center, anticipated to come onstream by 2013. As part of this announcement, Sergei Kiriyenko, head of the Federal Nuclear Power Agency, said, “Any country can become a member of the center by signing an intergovernmental agreement granting it guaranteed access to uranium enrichment services.” We conclude Namibia may wish to participate in this arrangement.

Enter CNNC on Sunday night. The Chinese company’s deputy general manager for uranium procurement announced to Bloomberg News that CNNC and UraMin will start ‘more formal’ talks this week.

UraMin is a prime acquisition candidate for the Chinese because of its uranium prospects in both Namibia and Niger. The company also has holdings in South Africa and the Central African Republic.

We are now facing a new era of uranium politics or rather ‘Uranium Politiques.’ And there is good reason for this to escalate. Yesterday, the U.S. Energy Information Administration issued ‘International Energy Outlook 2007.’ The report announced, “World marketed energy is expected to grow by 57 percent between 2004 and 2030.”

The most rapid growth in energy demand is anticipated in non-OECD Asia. The majority of this energy demand growth would come from China and India. This was the reference case - the middle ground of growth.

Also on Monday, leading Russian nuclear expert Yevgeny Velikhov, head of the Kurchatov Institute, told reporters at a news conference that the recent surge in uranium prices “may still grow by another order of magnitude.” He believes the uranium price will continue to rise as global uranium demand soars while supplies remain tight. “The global energy market is very turbulent,” Velikhov said. “The uranium price can hit any mark at a time of crisis.” Ironically, both crisis and turbulence have come about because of the Asian and Russian scramble to lock-up the uranium resources of entire countries.

The energy battle in Africa is good news for the two front-runners in Namibia: UraMin and Forsys Metals. We’ve called this a horse race, over the past several months. Both endeavor to become the ‘next miner’ following Paladin Resources in this country.

Yet, both companies are vulnerable to acquisition efforts by Russian or Chinese companies. Or either could be acquired by one or more majors hoping to build up their uranium reserves. In the case of Rio Tinto, acquiring one or both could mean expanding uranium operations in this country.

Acquisition Candidates

Just as the announcement by Energy Metals Corp, regarding a potential sale of the company, fueled weekend speculation as to the ‘next’ takeover candidates, the same could occur this week with African acquisition candidates.

One might be misled into believing China would focus on Niger, where the company has built a foundation, and Russia’s focus would remain in Namibia. However, in a state visit to China this week, Namibian Defense force chief exchanged views with Guo Boxiong, Central Military Commission vice chairman, on promoting relations between the two countries.

In February, Chinese President Hu Jintao visited Namibia to sign an economic deal with Namibia giving the country a grant of US$4.3 million and an interest-free loan of the same amount. Reportedly, some of the money would be used to boost group tourism from China to Namibia. This is the same tactic China has utilized in courting relationships in South America to help develop natural resource deals.

With US$1.2 trillion in foreign currency reserves, China is exercising its financial biceps. In March, the country formed the Huijin Fund as the state’s investment arm. Up to US$400 billion have reportedly been placed in this fund for investment purposes. On Sunday night, the Huijin Fund invested US$3 billion to purchase a stake in about 9.9 percent of the Blackstone private equity firm. Our research suggests the fund is likely to strongly invest in natural resources.

On this basis, we can not rule out a simple carving of Africa. We don’t believe China will quietly step back and focus the country’s uranium acquisition efforts in Niger, permitting Russia to concentrate on Namibia and South African uranium.

In Niger, we covered two ‘early days’ prospective uranium juniors over a year ago. North Atlantic Resources acquired a uranium permit in the 1900-square kilometer Abelajouad in this country. This past April, the company increased its holdings to nearly 3,000 square kilometers. In late April, Northwestern Mineral Ventures announced uranium mineralization in assays from rock samples after a first-pass reconnaissance on its In Gall and Irhazer uranium properties. Both would need to further explore their properties before attracting serious interest from the Chinese.

However, in Namibia both UraMin and Forsys Metals are actively progressing toward mining uranium on their properties. Either could be the first, but we believe both should become winners in the uranium bull market. Because China has carefully aligned with UraMin, or at least shown an inkling to do so, we suspect Russia might begin to look more carefully at Forsys Metals. This is purely speculation based upon our premise of ‘uranium Politiques.’ We do not have any ‘inside track’ on this matter.

Fortunately, we had the opportunity to chat with Forsys chief executive Duane Parnham late last week. His company had announced the completion of the pre-feasibility study on the company’s Valencia uranium deposit in Namibia. We missed the company’s conference call, but were allowed the opportunity to discuss his company’s prospects and future plans during a telephone call.

The company’s pre-feasibility study was prepared by Australia-based Snowden Mining, which used the guidelines of Australia’s JORC code. Subsequently, the Valencia uranium mineral reserve was classified as Probable Reserves. These were calculated at 24 million pounds U3O8.

We asked about production. “We are now modeling 2.4 million pounds per year,” Parnham told us. He expects to payback in less than two years. With Forsys as with all near-term producers, some early conversations have begun about pre-selling the company’s uranium production after production has commenced.

His company’s news release talked about six month of stripping during the initial part of the operation so we started there. “We’ll start when we get a mining license and then looking at production.” When will the company complete its ongoing environmental assessment? “We are hoping to have an environmental decision by year end,” Parnham told us. “We are hoping to have enough data to apply for a mining license in early 2008. If that’s successful, then obviously the decision to go forward will be made at that time.”

For the time being, the company plans to expand its resource. “The pre-feasibility is just the first snapshot of the situation,” he said. “We are finding the pit optimization study is only looking at a very small portion of the overall resource.” Does that mean the resource is actually larger, then? “It’s a heck of a lot bigger,” he told us. “It’s just a function of how much data you have available to punch into the model. Then, how much does the model give you back? The evaluation process is ongoing. You’ll probably see a change in the pit design very shortly because we have the ability to move more resource into the reserve category.”

We talked about his company’s horse race with UraMin. How does it look? “Neck and neck, toe to toe,” Parnham said. “I think it shows there’s opportunity in Namibia, and that’s good that there are a number of us working for a common goal.”

Finally, we asked what has emerged as the key question: Is Forsys a ripe plum for the picking. He offered both sides of the coin. “Where the real opportunity lies is putting a property into production,” he responded. “The operation isn’t all that difficult so it’s not a deposit that our expanding team couldn’t put into production.” And then Parnham left the door open. “Anything can happen. It’s an open market, and we are a public company. But, we are certainly geared toward putting this into production.”

And from what we’ve seen among the recent, significant consolidations, those companies who have commenced production, and those closest to production, are the prime acquisition candidates. Why should companies developing projects in Africa become the exception instead of the rule? Especially when two super powers are both eagerly trying to establish stronger uranium footholds in this continent.

COPYRIGHT © 2007 by StockInterview.com

 

Quelle:

http://iblogarea.com/diezelsblog6263/page/2/

desto weniger steigt Forsys!? eigenartig!

Der Zocker  

verkauf mal lieber anstatt hier nur rotz niederzuschreiben ! wenn du überhaupt shares besitzst was ich mittlerweile sehr sehr stark bezweifle ! oder du bist zu hoch eingestigen und hast deine geduld überschätzt !

also immer schön locker ;-)  

darf hier  kein noch so kleiner Zweifel an Forsys geschrieben werden?
Ihr müsst ja ganz schön hoch drinnen sein wenn ihr gleich so aufgeregt seid!
Ich bin hoch eingestiegen, das stimmt, (bei 5,40) und habe aber mittlerweile durch nachkaufen einen MK von 3,10. Die 1,60 waren Gold wert!! So, jetzt weisst du warum ich bei 3,50 weg bin.
Aber wenn mir etwas falsch vorkommt, oder ich etwas nicht verstehe, dann werde ich es hier reinstellen, denn dafür sind solche Foren gedacht, oder?

Der Zocker  

aber der einzige der zur zeit hier panik schiebt bist du ! natürlich ist es deine entscheidung wenn du bei 3,50 weg bist hab ich letztens auch geschrieben dass ich dies begrüßen würde ! falsch kommt mir hier eher etwas anderes vor .. aber bestimmt nicht forsys !

wie gesagt vielleicht gehört deine nicht ausreichende geduld dazu hier wurde erwähnt dass das "große" geld kurzfristig nicht drinne sein wird ! oder vielleicht doch !?!  

dass dir bei einem kurs von 1,60 € komischerweise hier nichts falsch vorgekommen ist hmm ?! aber natürlich jeder wie er möcht und da hast du recht dazu sind foren da ;-)  

Forsys Expands Uranium Zones at Valencia
Tuesday April 29, 1:00 pm ET

TORONTO, ONTARIO--(Marketwire - April 29, 2008) - Forsys Metals Corp. (TSX:FSY - News; FRANKFURT:F2T - News; NSX:FSY) ("Forsys" or the "Company") is pleased to report the initial percussion drilling results from the 10,000 m percussion drilling programme at the Company's 100% owned Valencia Uranium deposit ("Valencia") in Namibia, Africa. As described in the Company's news release dated January 14, 2008, this programme is designed to expand the Valencia resource to the North, South and East as well as below the proposed Main Zone pit floor. Historically few drill holes have been completed below a 200-250 m depth in these areas.

The first 3,850 m of the percussion drilling campaign comprised ten (10) vertical holes located south and west of the Valencia Main Zone with one hole located within the Transition Zone (refer to Figure 1).

Results demonstrate the following:

- Uranium mineralization encountered from surface to drill hole bottom (350 m) potentially increasing the uranium resource south of the current Valencia deposit

- Ten drill holes terminated in uranium mineralization of varying grades, some higher than the June 2007 reserve estimate (Forsys Metals Corp; Valencia Project, Namibia - Technical Report, Snowden Mining Industry Consultants Pty Ltd). These results confirm the potential for depth extension.

To view "Figure 1 - Schematic Plan View of Pit Surface; view of some diamond drill holes and percussion holes" and "Figure 2- NE-SW Schematic Longitudinal Section of Proposed Valencia Pit Looking North", please visit the following link: http://media3.marketwire.com/docs/429fsy_figures1and2.pdf.

Selected results of the drilling South of the Main Zone including holes with grades higher than the current Valencia reserve grade of 0.120 Kg/T are shown in the table below (refer to the Company's website at http://www.forsysmetals.com for full results).


--------------------------------------------------
From To Interval Grade
Hole (m) (m) (m) (Kg/T eU3 O8)(1)
--------------------------------------------------
PD-002 1.80 350.00 348.20 0.124
Including 288.50 350.00 61.50 0.225
--------------------------------------------------
PD-003 0.00 348.50 348.50 0.109
Including 300.90 348.40 47.50 0.180
--------------------------------------------------
PD-005 228.00 332.00 104.00 0.164
Including 228.10 261.20 33.10 0.225
Including 313.20 331.90 18.70 0.222
--------------------------------------------------
PD-007 243.50 353.20 109.70 0.132
Including 319.50 353.00 33.50 0.184
--------------------------------------------------
PD-011 167.40 360.00 192.60 0.143
--------------------------------------------------
PD-006 0.00 350.00 350.00 0.141
Including 239.90 303.90 64.00 0.296
Including 347.40 349.50 2.10 0.241
--------------------------------------------------

Table 1 - Selected drilling highlights from the first 3,850 m of the ongoing
10,000 m drilling programme

(1) The results in this news release are reported as equivalent ppm U3O8.
The Company has calculated a correlation between grade thickness product
of gamma counts (counts per second) collected by down hole geophysical
methods and the grade thickness product of chemical assays from Forsys'
drill hole library (otherwise known as GT Chem and GT Rad). That
correlation has been established with over 100 GT intervals and is used
to calculate eU3O8 in the percussion drill holes from gamma probe
survey with a resulting correlation coefficient of 0.99 (estimation of
confidence level).


The remaining 6,150 m of the programme is progressing well with a second drill rig being added; results of the Company's findings are forthcoming.

Duane Parnham, the Company's President & CEO, commented: "Management is encouraged with the initial results of the percussion drilling program and its potential to add substantially to Valencia's resources and reserves".

Dr. Roger Laine, Ph.D., P.Geo, Chief Geologist of Forsys, is the designated Qualified Person responsible for all of Forsys' exploration programmes as well as the person responsible for the contents of this news release. Dr. Laine has extensive experience as a geological engineer with a Ph.D in geosciences specializing in exploration, development, geostatistics and reserve estimating. He has over 30 years of uranium exploration experience of which 14 years were spent at Areva (formerly known as Cogema).

On Behalf of the Board of Directors of Forsys Metals Corp

Duane Parnham, President and CEO

For further information visit our web site at www.forsysmetals.com.

Sedar Profile #00008536

Shares Outstanding: 77,054,498

About Forsys Metals Corp.

Forsys Metals Corp is an innovative uranium development company focused on advancing the Valencia Uranium Deposit, the Company's 100% owned flagship project to production. With the bankable feasibility study underway, the Company is undertaking the transition to become a significant contributor to the uranium fuel business.

Forward-Looking Information

This press release contains "forward-looking information" including statements and information regarding exploration results. Such forward-looking information reflects the current expectations or beliefs of the Company. Forward-looking information is subject to a number of risks, assumptions and uncertainties that may cause the actual results of the Company to differ materially from those discussed herein, including the possibility that future exploration results will not be consistent with the announced results or the Company's expectations, the resource/reserve and grade of the ore body may not be upgraded, the uncertainties involved in interpreting exploration results and other inherent risks in the mineral exploration and development industry. Such forward-looking information speaks only as of the date on which it is made and, unless required by applicable securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or results or otherwise.

The Toronto Stock Exchange has not reviewed and does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.


Contact:

Bruce Hall
Forsys Metals Corp.
Chief Communications Officer
(905) 844 4646
Email: bhall@forsysmetals.com

Forsys Metals Corp.
In Namibia
+264 61 219 462
Email: vul@forsysmetals.com
Website: www.forsysmetals.com
 

sind das die berühmten fehlenden high grads ???

mfg  

es handelt sich hier nicht um die fehlenden Bohrlöcher aus der Joly Zone, sondern es geht hier darum die Ressourcen im Valencia-Gebiet zu erweitern. Die aufgelisteten Resultate zeigen eindeutig eine Ressourcenerweiterung und sind deshalb positiv aufzunehmen.

No-Cash

erweiterung und der kurs???

man langsam nervig................  

weshalb steigt der Kurs nicht? Nun, dazu gibt es mehrere Faktoren die momentan eine Rolle spielen.

1) Gesamtmarktlage (denke, dass ich hier nicht weiter eingehen muss, wurde ja schon hundert mal durchgekaut, ansonsten schaue dir die Charts anderer Explorer an.)

2) Alle warten auf die Abbaulizenz. Was hat man von einer Ressourcenerweiterung ohne Abbaulizenz?

3) Finanzierung. Was hat man von einer Ressourcenerweiterung, einer Abbaulizenz ohne genügend finanziellen Mitteln um das Uran auch abbauen zu können.

Wie du siehst spielt diese Ressourcenerweiterung momentan für potentielle Anger keine große Rolle. Erst wenn die Abbaulizenz und die Finanzierung unter Dach und Fach sind, wird die Ressourcenerweiterung eine Rolle spielen.

No-Cash

Valencia hat bessere Ergebnisse vorzuweisen als letztes Jahr im Juli. Ca. die zwei bis dreifachen Gehalte aber halt tiefer und damit kostspielieger.

Diese news werden erst später ihre wichtigkeit erhalten doch zur zeit steht anderes im vordergrund ! ;-)

aber man sieht forsys ackert weiter !

 

 

kann mich erinnern das mit bekanntgabe der lizenz bis ende april gerechnet werden sollte.ich hoffe mal das das jetzt in den kommenden beiden wochen von statten geht.
was echt nen bisschen komisch ist zur zeit , ist der sehr geringe umsatz.
zum thema erweiterung wäre doch eine andere reihenfolge wünschenswert.
erst lizenz dann erweiterung, finanzierung USW................

mfg  

das ist reine Ansichtssache, das hängt davon ab wie man den Kurs in die Höhe bringen möchte: langsam oder explosionsartig.

No-Cash