Thursday, August 31, 2006.
Gazprom is looking at assets in France and Belgium as it continues its powerful push into the gas markets of Western Europe.
Deputy CEO Alexander Medvedev said Gazprom would consider buying up assets left out of a contentious merger between Paris-based utilities Gaz de France and Suez, French newspaper La Tribune reported Wednesday.
The companies may be forced to spin off the assets as a part of their pending merger, announced earlier this year, which has attracted the attention of European competition authorities.
Yet, Gazprom's interest in the assets is prompting concerns that the gas behemoth would exercise undue influence in France, where it is already the biggest gas supplier.
Gazprom has made no secret of its plans to expand in Western Europe, home to some of the world's biggest gas consumers. Target markets for gas delivery, investment, or acquisitions include Britain, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Spain and Italy.
Meanwhile, this week Gazprom finalized a deal with German energy firm E.On to supply a total of 400 billion cubic meters of gas through 2035, as well as additional cooperation on the North European Gas Pipeline, which is planned to run under the Baltic Sea to northern Germany.
"They're very interested in picking up assets downstream in Europe to further consolidate their market," said Daniel Simmons, a gas supply expert with the Paris-based International Energy Agency. "Gazprom currently supplies France with gas, so there is some potential logic to a potential bid," he said, referring to the Suez and Gaz de France assets.
The French government is currently considering lowering its stake in state-controlled Gaz de France. Suez, a French-Dutch company, owns a stake in Belgium's Fluxys gas company through its Tractebel unit.
Gaz de France is in talks with Gazprom on the prolongation of a long-term supply contract.
Gazprom did not immediately reply to a request for comment on its Western European strategy.
Christel des Royeries, a Gaz de France spokeswoman, said it was "much too early" to talk about possible asset sales in the wake of the merger with Suez.
Des Royeries said the French parliament was working on legislation to allow the state's share in the gas company to fall to 33 percent. Currently, under French law the state has to own at least 70 percent of the utility, and the state now owns 80 percent.
The European Commission has listed its anti-monopoly concerns in a letter to Suez and Gaz de France, a preliminary step to granting approval to the merger, she said.
"The competition authorities have said they cannot own virtually the whole of the French and the whole Belgian gas monopoly," said Jonathan Stern, director of gas research at the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.
Stern said it was too early to say exactly what assets Suez and Gaz de France would spin off, but that attention had focused recently on the gas distribution and marketing network in Belgium. If the Belgian property were put up for sale, Gazprom would not be the only bidder.
"When we see the assets announced, you'll just see a huge number of very large utilities descend," Stern said. "Literally every one of the actors on the European gas scene will be in on it."
Stern said these wealthy European utilities could quite possibly outbid Gazprom, since a gas network in their backyard means more to them than to Russia. But Gazprom could acquire the network through an asset swap: trading the network for access to Gazprom's gas deliveries or upstream production.
Earlier this year, Gazprom agreed to swap stakes in its vast Yuzhno-Russkoye gas field near Tomsk in return for assets held by Germany's E.On and BASF, which with Wintershall are Gazprom's partners in building the Baltic pipeline.
E.On took a stake of 25 percent minus one share Yuzhno-Russkoye and gave Gazprom stakes of 50 percent minus one share in its Hungarian gas companies. BASF took a 35 percent minus one share in Yuzhno-Russkoye. In return, Gazprom increased its stake in BASF's gas distribution firm, Wingas, from 35 percent to 50 percent minus one share, and also won a stake in a BASF production subsidiary in Libya.
Stern said that with gas-related assets trading at sky-high prices, Gazprom would probably use swaps to get its hands on more European assets.
Outright purchases require spending cash or issuing debt. In 2005, Gazprom borrowed more money abroad than any other Russian company, with $4.3 billion issued in foreign-currency denominated debt, not including debt issued by Gazprombank, according to data from Dealogic. Trading assets helps Gazprom develop partners and integrate itself into Western energy markets, an important step for future deals, including liquefied natural gas, or LNG.
But Adam Landes, an oil and gas analyst at Renaissance Capital, said that because of the relatively small size of the Gaz de France and Suez assets compared with Gazprom, an outright acquisition might make more sense.
Recently, Gazprom has bartered for and purchased LNG for small shipments to Britain and the United States. Currently Gazprom cannot process its own gas into LNG, but starting 2010 it hopes to send LNG from its Shtokman fields to the United States and Western Europe.
Gazprom is in talks with the Netherlands on entering the Dutch energy market, and Dutch firm Gasunie in June agreed to take a stake in the North European Gas Pipeline, which may be extended to the Netherlands and on to Britain.
In Italy, Gazprom has approached Eni subsidiary Italgas about swapping some of its assets for a stake in Russian exploration and production. Medvedev has said Gazprom is considering supplying spot LNG deliveries to Spain through swap deals. Meanwhile, the Spanish gas company Repsol has expressed interest in Gazprom's LNG plant at the Baltic port of Ust-Luga.
Simmons said that if Gazprom acquired more assets in Western Europe, competition regulators might want to look at the consequences, since it already supplied more than one-quarter of the continent's gas.
"The worry has been in the past that if they're buying all these downstream assets, what are they doing upstream in order to make sure Europe is getting all the gas it needs in future?" Simmons said. "Whenever a company is diversifying, you worry about its core business."
|