Hättest Du den Artikel von TheStreet.com vom Do, 20.08., 12:26 pm gelesen http://www.thestreet.com/story/10584919/1/...s-on-failure-report.html dann hättest Du wohl die Finger von GFG gelassen: "....FDIC spokesman David Barr told TheStreet.com that the leaks were "unfortunate," since a very confusing situation could develop if a published report of a pending bank failure proves inaccurate. Guaranty Financial's main subsidiary is Guaranty Bank of Austin, Texas. As of June 30, the thrift had a Tier 1 leverage ratio of negative 7.11%, which was quite a drop from a positive 7.30% just the previous quarter. This ratio needs to be at least 5% for most banks and thrifts to be considered well-capitalized. Guaranty Financial announced on July 17 that its capital had been wiped out because the Office of Thrift Supervision had required a restatement of Guaranty Bank's financial report for March 31, reflecting "substantial asset writedowns." At that time, Guaranty said it was probably the company could not "continue as a going concern." ..." Und wenn sie schon eine Colonial Bank mit total assets von 25 Mrd $ fallen lassen, können sie es auch bei einer Guaranty Bank mit 13 Mrd $ total assets. Übrigens: GFGF in N.Y. getaxt bei 0,092 $ http://www.nasdaq.com/aspx/...otes.aspx?symbol=GFGF&selected=GFGF
|