Interessantes Posting von einem canadischen Forum: "Yes, by June 1st, we should know a lot more about the future potential of EVG. The devil, as always, is in the details. A point of clarification if I may, when one or more posters seemed to suggest that we will be ultimately getting 30% of the gold at RSH at no cost....that is not quite accurate, if I have read the news release and presentation accurately. We are carried only to a feasibility study, and while the news release did not clarify what type of feasibility (preliminary or bankable), their presentation says "carried to production" so that is good to see. Keep in mind that we will be responsible for 30% of all the development and operational costs if a decision is made to build a mine, so there is no free ride. But 30% of a significant gold producing mine is not too bad a deal, if the feasibility study is positive.
Perhaps GC (who no doubt had some idea of what has been in the works over the past months) has been discreetly unloading their interest in EVG now that AGE has come along to assume a 70% interest in RSH, or maybe they want to stay in for the Carlin/Humbolt play here. Some astute posters here have suggested that the RSH NI 43-101 due out soon may not be as high as some think and I tend to agree with that as it is still very early days with tons of drilling needed yet. I still think it will come in around a million oz. inferred, give or take 250k ozs, as posted some time ago, but I do hope that the number is higher.
Also, with EVG's primary focus now suddenly changing to the C/H, one can validly wonder if they have a tiger by the tail and know it. As so many have said over the past 24 hours, 'time will tell'. Additionally, there is very little doubt but that the $23 mm in shares will be via a private placement, otherwise trading on the open market would not accrue the money to EVG at all."
|