Ich bin eben auf einen, wie ich finde, interessanten Artikel gestossen: Ein deutscher Airline Pilot schildert die Flugzeugmanöver / Abstürze am 9/11 aus seiner Sicht. Darüber hinaus macht er auch Aussagen, über Sinn, respektive Unsinn von aktionistischen "Sicherheitsmassnahmen" in den Terminals, während ein Flugzeug kurz vor der Landung beispielsweise problemlos abgeschossen werden könnte. Die Frage stellt sich also einmal mehr: Wieso dieser Aktionismus? Was soll damit erreicht werden? Wer profitiert davon? http://www.gerhard-wisnewski.de/...php?name=News&file=article&sid=288
Eine weitere These, vertreten von einem amerikanischen Professor: Thermite und Sulfur haben den Stahl im WTC zum schmelzen gebracht -->
Die Puzzleteile fügen sich langsam zu einem Bild zusammen. Vielleicht hängen ja das Öl im Mittleren Osten und im Kaspischen Meer, die Klimaerwärmung und 911 irgendwie zusammen? Peak Oil als Stichwort dazu. Auf google gibt es eine Dokumentation dazu (knapp 50 Minuten, aber es lohnt sich) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8677389869548020370
"mehrfach ausgezeichneter Dokumentarfilm von Eugene Jarecki aus dem Jahre 2005 und behandelt die Ausartungen des militärisch-industriellen Komplexes in den USA" Zitat von: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_We_Fight
The Ultimate Collection, dozens of live news video, Documents 9/11 WTC Demolition Conspiracy The years of work have now been documented for those you can not Debunk after the facts are clearly laid out in a portfolio video collection of dozens of live news video references to explosions inside the WTC twin towers. Let us see how many Debunkers can come up with a better collection of facts to support TPTB official Guberment 9/11 thesis?
Abundant eye witness evidence. Now, for the first time ever, DOZENS of live video references to the multiple internal explosions that brought down the Twin Tower and World Trade Center 7.
It happened in broad daylight, thousands experienced it first hand, millions saw and heard the overwhelming evidence on TV, yet in spite of that, a government-created myth contradicted by all of it has become the official version of events.
Hollywood director and documentary film maker Aaron Russo has gone in-depth on the astounding admissions of Nick Rockefeller, who ... all personally told him that the elite's ultimate goal was to create a microchipped population and that the war on terror was a hoax, Rockefeller having predicted an "event" that would trigger the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan eleven months before 9/11. Rockefeller also told Russo that his family's foundation had created and bankrolled the women's liberation movement in order to destroy the family and that population reduction was a fundamental aim of the global elite.
The Big Brother State is an educational film about what politicians claim to be protection of our freedom but what we refer to as repressive legislation. Since terrorism has become a global threat, especially after 9/11, governments all over the world have started enforcing laws which, so the governments say, should increase national security. These laws obviously aim at another goal: the states gaining more and more control of their citizens at the cost of our privacy and freedom.
Grundaussage: die förderbaren Ölreserven sind bekannt, die maximale Menge Oel das gefördert werden kann (=Peak Oil) wird in nächster Zeit erreicht sein, danach wird die Menge stetig abnehmen. Das heisst, wir müssen uns darauf einstellen, dass irgendwann kein Öl mehr vorhanden sein wird (wo Kosten / Nutzen in einem wirtschaftlichen Verhältnis stehen). Dies wird umfassende Veränderungen unserer Lebensgewohnheiten nötig machen. Nicht nur Autofahren ist davon betroffen, unser westlicher Lebensstil basiert auf Produkten aus Öl (z.B. Plastik, Medikamente, Kleidung, Chemische Produkte, Treibstoff...)
ein ehemaliger Mitarbeiter von R. Reagan meint zur aktuellen (politischen) Lage in den USA:
Threats from Bush Administration in 2007 and 2008: Roberts on the Thom Hartmann radio program in July of 2007 issued a public warning that he believes the Bush administration is preparing to orchestrate a staged terrorist attack in the United States, transform the country into a dictatorship and launch a war with Iran within the next year. He also was critical of a new Executive Order, released July 17, allowing the White House to seize the assets of anyone who interferes with its Iraq policies and giving the government expanded police powers to exercise control in the country. "When Bush exercises this authority [under the new Executive Order], there's no check to it. So it really is a form of total, absolute, one-man rule. The American people don't really understand the danger that they face." Roberts adding that the so-called neoconservatives intended to use a renewal of the fight against terrorism to rally the American people around the fading Republican Party. "The administration figures themselves and prominent Republican propagandists ... are preparing us for another 9/11 event or series of events," he said. "You have to count on the fact that if al Qaeda is not going to do it, it is going to be orchestrated." Roberts suggested that in the absence of a massive popular outcry, only the federal bureaucracy and perhaps the military could put constraints on Bush's current drive for a fully-fledged dictatorship. "They may have had enough. They may not go along with it," he said. The radio interview was a follow-up to Robert's latest column, in which he warned that "unless Congress immediately impeaches Bush and Cheney, a year from now the U.S. could be a dictatorial police state at war with Iran."
Interessant, dass gestandene hochrangige Militärs wie Gen. Wesley Clark, Major General Albert Stubblebine, Col. Ronald D. Ray, U.S. Marine Corps, usw. die "offizielle Story" hinterfragen. Es wird schwieriger die Augen zu verschliessen.
Wesley Clarke kritisiert die Seriosität des Untersuchungsberichtes und hinterfragt nicht "911". Zwischen Kritik an der Regierung und dem Verbraten von hanebüchenem Verschwörungskladeradatsch ist ein klitzekleiner Unterschied.
Unter den 110 genannten "seriösen" Kritikern des Untersuchungsberichtes sind 7, die einer Verschwörungstheorie das Wort reden. Da werden sich die wirklich seriösen sicher freuen, mit denen in einen Topf geworfen zu werden...
: Rosinenpicker, du weisst haargenau was ich meine
ob xy nun den offiziellen Report kritisiert oder 911 per se hinterfragt ist nicht das Thema. Fakt ist, dass auch für "seriöse" Militärs offensichtlich ist, dass die offizielle Story zum Himmel stinkt. Explizit zum Beispiel:
Lt. Col. Shelton F. Lankford, U.S. Marine Corps (ret) – Retired U.S. Marine Corps fighter pilot with over 300 combat missions flown. 20-year Marine Corps career. * Letter to the Editor 2/5/07: Regarding 9/11 "Our government has been hijacked by means of a "new Pearl Harbor" and a lot of otherwise good and decent people who are gullible enough to think that the first three steel-framed buildings in history fall down because they have some fires that the fire fighter on the scene said could be knocked down with a couple of hoses and through which people walked before they were photographed looking out the holes where the plane hit . One of these - bldg 7, was never hit by a plane and even NIST is ashamed to advance a reason for its collapse. And, miracle of miracles, these three buildings just happened to be leased and insured by the same guy who is on tape saying they decided to "PULL" the last one to fall." http://michigandaily.com
Commander Ralph Kolstad, U.S. Navy (ret) – Retired fighter pilot. Former Air Combat Instructor, U.S. Navy Fighter Weapons School (Topgun). 20-year Navy career. Aircraft flown: McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom, Douglas A-4 Skyhawk, and Grumman F-14 Tomcat. Retired commercial airline captain with 27 years experience. Aircraft flown: Boeing 727, 757 and 767, McDonnell Douglas MD-80, and Fokker F-100. 23,000+ total hours flown. Statement to this website 8/20/07: "I started questioning the Sept 11, 2001 “story” only days after the event. It just didn’t make any sense to me. How could a steel and concrete building collapse after being hit by a Boeing 767? Didn’t the engineers design it to withstand a direct hit from a Boeing 707, approximately the same size and weight of the 767? The evidence just didn’t add up. ... At the Pentagon, the pilot of the Boeing 757 did quite a feat of flying. I have 6,000 hours of flight time in Boeing 757’s and 767’s and could not have flown it the way the flight path was described. I was also a Navy fighter pilot and Air Combat Instructor, U.S. Navy Fighter Weapons School and have experience flying low altitude, high speed aircraft. I could not have done what these beginners did. Something stinks to high heaven! Where is the damage to the wall of the Pentagon from the wings? Where are the big pieces that always break away in an accident? Where is all the luggage? Where are the miles and miles of wire, cable, and lines that are part and parcel of any large aircraft? Where are the steel engine parts? Where is the steel landing gear? Where is the tail section that would have broken into large pieces? I also personally knew American Airlines Captain “Chick” Burlingame, who was the captain of Flight 77 which allegedly hit the Pentagon, and I know he would not have given up his airplane to crazies! And at the Shanksville Pennsylvania impact site, where is any of the wreckage?!!! Of all the pictures I have seen, there is only a hole! Where is any piece of a crashed airplane? Why was the area cordoned off, and no inspection allowed by the normal accident personnel? Where is any evidence at all? When one starts using his own mind, and not what one was told, there is very little to believe in the official “story”. ... Every question leads to another question that has not been answered by anyone in authority. This is just the beginning as to why I don’t believe the official “story” and why I want the truth to be told." usw...
False flag operations sind zudem nichts neues, vgl. Golf of Tonkin Zwischenfall, aber auch der Überfall des Radiosenders Gleiwitz ist so ein Beispiel. Geschichte wiederholt sich.