|
Damit ist meines Erachtens die "Recommendation von Judge Grewal" zu Kessler, neben den getroffenen "Rulings" von anderen Judges, (siehe Antwort von Bumgardner auf die De Novo Motion) einem Urteilsspruch gleichzusetzen. B&N wollte IMO nicht öffentlich machen, falls Chhabria heute geurteilt hätte, dass Sie ein "dead horse" reiten.
Die neuen Anwälte und das Ende von Leckrones "Blockaden" durch seine Persönlichkeits Paranoia, scheinen frischen Wind zu erzeugen.
Alles nur IMO..........!
Text des Pacers.
Plaintiffs Technology Properties Limited LLC, Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, and Patriot Scientific Corporation (collectively “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Barnes & Noble, Inc. (“B&N”) file this Joint Notice of Settlement notifying the Court as follows:
1. Plaintiffs and B&N have reached an agreement in principle that resolves all claims asserted by Plaintiffs against B&N, and all claims asserted by B&N against Plaintiffs, in the above-entitled and numbered action.
2. Plaintiffs and B&N will memorialize the terms of their agreement and expect to file a stipulation of dismissal requesting that the Court dismiss with prejudice all claims asserted between Plaintiffs and B&N in the above-entitled and numbered action within 30 calendar days of the date of this Notice. To that end, the parties jointly move the Court to stay all deadlines for 30 days.
3. In light of the settlement, B&N hereby notifies the Court that a hearing on Defendant Barnes & Noble, Inc.’s Motion for De Novo Determination of Dispositive Matter Referred to Magistrate Judge [Dkt. No. 89], currently scheduled for July 23, 2015 at 10:00 a.m., is no longer necessary. B&N reserves the right to ask the Court to recalendar its motion should the parties not be able to reach a final settlement. Plaintiffs consent to this request.
|
Thread abonnieren
.
